870 Million Dollar Verdict Remains for Flutter

by Dimitri Dimitrov Published on March 29, 2021
Last updated on June 22, 2026
Editorial Standards

☆ Editorial Standards

All news content is produced by qualified journalists and analysts under a published editorial code requiring accuracy, source verification, and editorial review prior to publication.

Advertisers and commercial partners have no influence over news coverage.


News editorial policy · Contact us
✓ Fact-Checked

✓ Fact-Checked

Every article undergoes senior editorial review.

Regulatory and legal reporting is cross-referenced against primary sources including official government and regulatory authority records.

Corrections are issued transparently with a visible update notice.


News fact-check policy
⊘ Independence

⊘ Independence

Gamblers Connect is a B2B iGaming media platform.

Editorial decisions, including what to cover, how to cover it, and what to publish, are made independently by our newsroom.

Commercial partners may purchase publication frequency but cannot influence editorial tone, angle, or content.


News independence policy
↗ Commercial Disclosure

↗ Commercial Disclosure

Gamblers Connect is a B2B media platform. We generate revenue through subscriptions, B2B referral partnerships, directory listings, advertising, and media services.

Gamblers Connect is not a licensed gambling operator, affiliate, or player acquisition channel in any jurisdiction.

We do not earn revenue from player activity, wagers, or deposits.


News commercial disclosure · Contact us

Flutter appeal denied by The Kentucky Supreme Court – 870 million dollars fine is still to be paid for violating gambling regulations.

Furthermore, in 2015, the court ordered PokerStars, or formerly known as Amaya, to pay 290 million USD in fines for the violation. The head authority officiating the trial was Judge Thomas Wingate from the Franklin Circuit Court. This amount additionally tripled after a request from the state. Consequently, Amaya rebranded into The Stars Group, in addition to Flutter later purchasing the said company.

Nevertheless, in 2018 the Kentucky Court of Appeals reversed the initial verdict. The new statement said that any approval for the fee will ”lead to an absurd, unjust result”. In addition, Betsson later appealed this judgement to the state Supreme Court. However, the Court only re-instituted the initial 879 million USD settlement. Flutter will certainly try and apply for another hearing. But many experts agree that the future doesn’t look bright. Especially if we take into consideration the rejection of the first appeal. Consequently, Flutter is pondering its next step, with the possibility of taking this matter to the United States Supreme Court.

To quote directly from a Flutter representative:

Flutter remains confident that any amount ultimately paid to resolve this matter will be a limited portion of the reinstated judgement.

Flutter Representative

Only time will tell what the true outcome of this conundrum will be. On one hand, we have the claims of Flutter that the punishment does not fit the crime. Which many people see as just, given how small is the profit next to the fine. However, the court believes that a company of such magnitude is not supposed to allow that kind of inconsistency and scandal. Hence the astronomical 870 million dollars fine that Flutter must pay. Whatever the case, we will have to wait and see. Until then, we have one of the most existing trials in the online gambling world in recent years.

Dimitri Dimitrov

Dimitri is an iGaming expert with nearly a decade of experience and a knack for crafting content that speaks directly to the iGaming crowd. He understands affiliate marketing, player psychology, and search algorithms, which enables him to write engaging, data-driven articles.

Sources
Source documentation not yet available for this article
Our editorial team is in the process of verifying and documenting sources for this content.
Mentioned in this Article