Australia Blacklists Polymarket as ACMA Classifies Prediction Markets as Gambling

by Dimitri Dimitrov Published on February 6, 2026
Editorial Standards

☆ Editorial Standards

All news content is produced by qualified journalists and analysts under a published editorial code requiring accuracy, source verification, and editorial review prior to publication.

Advertisers and commercial partners have no influence over news coverage.


News editorial policy · Contact us
✓ Fact-Checked

✓ Fact-Checked

Every article undergoes senior editorial review.

Regulatory and legal reporting is cross-referenced against primary sources including official government and regulatory authority records.

Corrections are issued transparently with a visible update notice.


News fact-check policy
⊘ Independence

⊘ Independence

Gamblers Connect is a B2B iGaming media platform.

Editorial decisions, including what to cover, how to cover it, and what to publish, are made independently by our newsroom.

Commercial partners may purchase publication frequency but cannot influence editorial tone, angle, or content.


News independence policy
↗ Commercial Disclosure

↗ Commercial Disclosure

Gamblers Connect is a B2B media platform. We generate revenue through subscriptions, B2B referral partnerships, directory listings, advertising, and media services.

Gamblers Connect is not a licensed gambling operator, affiliate, or player acquisition channel in any jurisdiction.

We do not earn revenue from player activity, wagers, or deposits.


News commercial disclosure · Contact us
he Australian and United States flags flying together, representing the divergent regulatory philosophies regarding prediction markets such as Polymarket.

In a landmark regulatory shift, Australia’s Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) has formally classified the decentralized prediction platform Polymarket as an unlicensed gambling operation.

The decision effectively shatters the industry’s narrative that such platforms are “financial products” rather than wagering tools.

A Hard Line on “Financial Innovation”

Polymarket has long positioned itself as a derivatives market, a strategy that allowed it to bypass traditional betting regulations in the United States.

However, ACMA’s investigation found no evidence of risk management or investment structures that would qualify the platform as a financial instrument under Australian law. Instead, regulators determined users were simply staking binary bets on future events.

“The investigation concluded that users were simply staking money on binary outcomes, yes or no, with the expectation of profit,” officials noted, leading to the inclusion Polymarket on Australia’s blacklist of over 1,300 illegal sites.

Accessibility and Enforcement

The probe revealed a staggering 1.9 million visits from Australian IP addresses over six months. ACMA staff were able to register and place bets without encountering any location-based blocks. Furthermore, the platform was caught offering prohibited in-play sports betting.

While Polymarket implemented geoblocking after the order, the borderless nature of crypto platforms remains a challenge. This precedent signals a global clash between Australian-style strict regulation and the more permissive US approach, where prediction markets have entered the mainstream.

Dimitri Dimitrov

Dimitri is an iGaming expert with nearly a decade of experience and a knack for crafting content that speaks directly to the iGaming crowd. He understands affiliate marketing, player psychology, and search algorithms, which enables him to write engaging, data-driven articles.

Sources
Source documentation not yet available for this article
Our editorial team is in the process of verifying and documenting sources for this content.
Mentioned in this Article