Louisiana Withdraws Prop Bet Ban as Fiscal Reality Collides with Policy Ambition

by Dimitri Dimitrov Published on April 3, 2026
Editorial Standards

☆ Editorial Standards

All news content is produced by qualified journalists and analysts under a published editorial code requiring accuracy, source verification, and editorial review prior to publication.

Advertisers and commercial partners have no influence over news coverage.


News editorial policy · Contact us
✓ Fact-Checked

✓ Fact-Checked

Every article undergoes senior editorial review.

Regulatory and legal reporting is cross-referenced against primary sources including official government and regulatory authority records.

Corrections are issued transparently with a visible update notice.


News fact-check policy
⊘ Independence

⊘ Independence

Gamblers Connect is a B2B iGaming media platform.

Editorial decisions, including what to cover, how to cover it, and what to publish, are made independently by our newsroom.

Commercial partners may purchase publication frequency but cannot influence editorial tone, angle, or content.


News independence policy
↗ Commercial Disclosure

↗ Commercial Disclosure

Gamblers Connect is a B2B media platform. We generate revenue through subscriptions, B2B referral partnerships, directory listings, advertising, and media services.

Gamblers Connect is not a licensed gambling operator, affiliate, or player acquisition channel in any jurisdiction.

We do not earn revenue from player activity, wagers, or deposits.


News commercial disclosure · Contact us
Louisiana lawmakers have officially withdrawn a proposed ban on proposition and micro-bets.

In a decision that highlights the complex tug-of-war between responsible gaming oversight and state tax reliance, Louisiana lawmakers have officially withdrawn a proposed ban on proposition and micro-bets.

Senate Bill 354, spearheaded by Senator Katrina Jackson-Andrews, was pulled from consideration after a devastating fiscal analysis revealed the move would strip nearly $40 million in annual revenue from the state’s coffers.

The “Compulsive” Debate vs. The $40M Revenue Hit

During a Senate Judiciary B Committee hearing on March 31, Senator Jackson-Andrews expressed deep concern over the high-frequency nature of these wagering formats.

“My issue with prop betting and micro betting is this, to be very clear, is that it’s very compulsive in nature,” Jackson-Andrews stated.

However, the moral argument met a cold reality when the Legislative Fiscal Office released its note. The analysis projected that a ban would slash $21 million annually from Louisiana’s General Fund through 2031, with an additional $17 million loss across dedicated funds, including those for healthcare and education.

A Market Dominated by High-Frequency Action

The fiscal note underscored just how essential these bets have become to the state’s economy. Data from the Louisiana Gaming Control Board shows that prop and micro-bets now account for a staggering 40% of all mobile sports wagers and 13% of retail betting.

These funds directly support the Supporting Programs, Opportunities, Resources, and Teams (SPORT) Fund, which assists student-athletes. Under the proposed ban, the SPORT Fund alone would have faced a $9 million annual deficit. Confronted with these numbers, Jackson-Andrews, who also serves on the Senate Finance Committee, acknowledged the legislative dilemma:

“I try to bring very responsible legislation… but also, serving on [the Senate] Finance [Committee], understanding that if this bill moves forward, we will have to find that $15m for the state general fund. It is an extremely serious issue that I need to revisit without this type of fiscal note on it”.

Louisiana in the National Regulatory Context

Louisiana’s reversal occurs amidst a fragmented national landscape. While states like Vermont, Ohio, and Maryland already restrict certain collegiate prop bets, and Kentucky recently passed its own targeted ban, few have attempted to eliminate microbetting entirely.

Microbets, which allow users to wager on individual plays like the next pitch in a baseball game, have drawn comparisons to slot machines in recent Pennsylvania lawsuits against giants like DraftKings and FanDuel, with critics arguing the format reduces natural stopping points for players.

While SB 354 is dead for the current session, Senator Jackson-Andrews signaled that the conversation is far from over, aiming for a “more reasonable” version in 2027 that balances player protection with fiscal stability.

Dimitri Dimitrov

Dimitri is an iGaming expert with nearly a decade of experience and a knack for crafting content that speaks directly to the iGaming crowd. He understands affiliate marketing, player psychology, and search algorithms, which enables him to write engaging, data-driven articles.

Sources
Source documentation not yet available for this article
Our editorial team is in the process of verifying and documenting sources for this content.
Mentioned in this Article