Dana White Urges Trump to Roll Back “Economically Irrational” Gambling Tax Provision

by Dimitri Dimitrov Published on May 15, 2026
Editorial Standards

☆ Editorial Standards

All news content is produced by qualified journalists and analysts under a published editorial code requiring accuracy, source verification, and editorial review prior to publication.

Advertisers and commercial partners have no influence over news coverage.


News editorial policy · Contact us
✓ Fact-Checked

✓ Fact-Checked

Every article undergoes senior editorial review.

Regulatory and legal reporting is cross-referenced against primary sources including official government and regulatory authority records.

Corrections are issued transparently with a visible update notice.


News fact-check policy
⊘ Independence

⊘ Independence

Gamblers Connect is a B2B iGaming media platform.

Editorial decisions, including what to cover, how to cover it, and what to publish, are made independently by our newsroom.

Commercial partners may purchase publication frequency but cannot influence editorial tone, angle, or content.


News independence policy
↗ Commercial Disclosure

↗ Commercial Disclosure

Gamblers Connect is a B2B media platform. We generate revenue through subscriptions, B2B referral partnerships, directory listings, advertising, and media services.

Gamblers Connect is not a licensed gambling operator, affiliate, or player acquisition channel in any jurisdiction.

We do not earn revenue from player activity, wagers, or deposits.


News commercial disclosure · Contact us
In a formal letter sent to President Donald Trump, Dana White urged the administration to reverse a federal limit on gambling loss deductions

A controversial tax provision embedded within the 2025 One Big Beautiful Bill Act has drawn the ire of the legal gambling industry, prompting UFC President Dana White to intervene.

In a formal letter sent to President Donald Trump, White urged the administration to reverse a federal limit on gambling loss deductions that has caused widespread alarm among professional bettors, casino operators, and sportsbooks since becoming law last year.

The “Phantom Income” Tax Trap

The technical crux of the issue involves the deduction of losses against winnings. Previously, U.S. gamblers could deduct 100 percent of their losses, meaning a bettor who won $500,000 but lost an equal amount owed no taxes. Under the revised code, only 90 percent of losses are deductible.

This shift exposes bettors to taxes on “phantom income” they never actually kept. High-volume sports bettors and poker players warn that this structure effectively punishes the “churn” of legal wagering rather than taxing actual profits.

UFC president Dana White’s appeal frames the provision as “economically irrational” for those operating within regulated markets. He also pointed to secondary damage in Nevada’s tourism sector, arguing that heavier tax exposure leads to smaller tips for hospitality workers, a direct hit to the administration’s “No Tax on Tips” messaging.

Safeguarding Regulated Markets

The broader industry fear is that this cap will drive sophisticated bettors back into the hands of illegal offshore operators who do not issue IRS forms. White emphasized that regulated betting is now essential infrastructure for professional sports:

“[Regulated sports betting has become] deeply integrated into modern professional sports, helping leagues and promotions drive audience engagement, sponsorship revenue, and media value.”

As a longtime ally of Trump, White’s involvement elevates the dispute from a niche industry complaint to a high-profile political issue. The underlying message to Washington is straightforward: if the government expects citizens to remain within transparent, taxable, and regulated legal markets, the tax code must not penalize them for doing so.

Dimitri Dimitrov

Dimitri is an iGaming expert with nearly a decade of experience and a knack for crafting content that speaks directly to the iGaming crowd. He understands affiliate marketing, player psychology, and search algorithms, which enables him to write engaging, data-driven articles.

Sources
Source documentation not yet available for this article
Our editorial team is in the process of verifying and documenting sources for this content.
Mentioned in this Article