Apple And Google Facing Charges For Promoting Illegal Gambling Apps

by Dimitri Dimitrov Published on December 3, 2024
Last updated on June 14, 2025
Editorial Standards

☆ Editorial Standards

All news content is produced by qualified journalists and analysts under a published editorial code requiring accuracy, source verification, and editorial review prior to publication.

Advertisers and commercial partners have no influence over news coverage.


News editorial policy · Contact us
✓ Fact-Checked

✓ Fact-Checked

Every article undergoes senior editorial review.

Regulatory and legal reporting is cross-referenced against primary sources including official government and regulatory authority records.

Corrections are issued transparently with a visible update notice.


News fact-check policy
⊘ Independence

⊘ Independence

Gamblers Connect is a B2B iGaming media platform.

Editorial decisions, including what to cover, how to cover it, and what to publish, are made independently by our newsroom.

Commercial partners may purchase publication frequency but cannot influence editorial tone, angle, or content.


News independence policy
↗ Commercial Disclosure

↗ Commercial Disclosure

Gamblers Connect is a B2B media platform. We generate revenue through subscriptions, B2B referral partnerships, directory listings, advertising, and media services.

Gamblers Connect is not a licensed gambling operator, affiliate, or player acquisition channel in any jurisdiction.

We do not earn revenue from player activity, wagers, or deposits.


News commercial disclosure · Contact us
apple_google_sued

Apple and Google, two of the biggest and most influential technology and corporation giants, are facing a lawsuit for promoting illegal gambling apps in the state of New Jersey.

More specifically, Apple and Google have allegedly hosted sweepstakes casino games from several online gambling operators in the likes of Wow Vegas, McLuck, Crowncoins Casino, and High 5 Casino.

As per the details of the lawsuit, the actions of Apple and Google are in direct violation of the federal RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) Act, specifically created to battle organized crime, as well as individuals and companies that profit from illegal gambling.

The suggested Model Internet Gaming Act, which aims to fully ban sweepstakes, mandates fines of up to $100,000 per violation, and consequently, ban all such apps altogether.

This case is about patently illegal gambling software being distributed to the cell phones, desktop computers and other personal electronic devices of individuals throughout New Jersey and beyond, by an unlawful enterprise that includes two of the most successful corporations in the world.

Moreover, the complaint states that the lawsuit is “about illegal gambling software being distributed” across multiple portable devices throughout New Jersey, made possible by “two of the most successful corporations in the world”.

The complaint touches upon the standard sweepstakes structure where players receive “Game Coins” to play casino games, referring to “Sweeps Coins”, a digital incentive that can be exchanged for cash and rewards.

The lawsuit against Apple and Google states that the payouts made through these platforms are seldom honoured, attributing the non-existent payouts to “arbitrary and largely artificial justifications”.

Julian Bargo, the lead plaintiff, has reportedly lost “well over” $1,000 on these particular sweepstakes casino websites.

Lawyers claim that both Google and Apple violated the federal RICO Act, which, in turn, allows civil lawsuits for activities that were administered as part of an organized criminal scheme.

Furthermore, the lawsuit states that Google’s Play Store and Apple’s App Store are supporting illegal payments between third parties, and more concerning, they considerably profit from the proceedings.

The Gaming Defendants have succeeded in misleading regulators about the true nature of their operations for far too long. These Defendants are not licensed casinos. They are not regulated by any casino regulator as a traditional casino would be. No one is looking over anyone’s shoulder to ensure that the digital dice aren’t loaded. And the Gaming Defendants have, thus far, managed to entirely insulate themselves from civil liability by hiding behind an iron curtain of bizarre arbitration agreements, many of which require arbitration in far-flung locales like Malta, the Isle of Man, etc.

The National Council of Legislators from the Gaming States have prepared a proposal that includes fines between $10,000-$100,000 per offence, as well as prison sentences of up to two years for repeated felonies.

Dimitri Dimitrov

Dimitri is an iGaming expert with nearly a decade of experience and a knack for crafting content that speaks directly to the iGaming crowd. He understands affiliate marketing, player psychology, and search algorithms, which enables him to write engaging, data-driven articles.

Sources
Source documentation not yet available for this article
Our editorial team is in the process of verifying and documenting sources for this content.
Mentioned in this Article