SPGA and ACLU Join Forces to Oppose California DFS Bill

by Dimitri Dimitrov Published on July 16, 2025
Editorial Standards

☆ Editorial Standards

All news content is produced by qualified journalists and analysts under a published editorial code requiring accuracy, source verification, and editorial review prior to publication.

Advertisers and commercial partners have no influence over news coverage.


News editorial policy · Contact us
✓ Fact-Checked

✓ Fact-Checked

Every article undergoes senior editorial review.

Regulatory and legal reporting is cross-referenced against primary sources including official government and regulatory authority records.

Corrections are issued transparently with a visible update notice.


News fact-check policy
⊘ Independence

⊘ Independence

Gamblers Connect is a B2B iGaming media platform.

Editorial decisions, including what to cover, how to cover it, and what to publish, are made independently by our newsroom.

Commercial partners may purchase publication frequency but cannot influence editorial tone, angle, or content.


News independence policy
↗ Commercial Disclosure

↗ Commercial Disclosure

Gamblers Connect is a B2B media platform. We generate revenue through subscriptions, B2B referral partnerships, directory listings, advertising, and media services.

Gamblers Connect is not a licensed gambling operator, affiliate, or player acquisition channel in any jurisdiction.

We do not earn revenue from player activity, wagers, or deposits.


News commercial disclosure · Contact us
A stylized image of the California state flag, symbolizing the ongoing legislative debate over the legality of DFS and sweepstakes in the state.

A diverse coalition of organizations, including the Social and Promotional Games Association (SPGA) and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), has joined forces to oppose a new bill in California that aims to prohibit daily fantasy sports (DFS).

The bill, AB 831, was introduced by California Attorney General Rob Bonta and is currently before the State Senate.

In addition to the SPGA and ACLU, the alliance includes the American Transaction Processors Coalition, the Association of National Advertisers, and the Social Gaming Leadership Alliance (SGLA), among others.

The groups have united over shared concerns about the bill’s potential impact on both consumers and lawful businesses.

The SPGA announced the alliance on its website, stating that its primary concern is the legislative uncertainty created by the bill’s general language, particularly regarding the legality of sweepstakes operations, which are currently legal in California.

An official legislative hearing for the bill is scheduled for July 15, 2025.

An SPGA spokesperson released a full statement on the matter.

The SPGA is proud to stand alongside the ACLU, the Association of National Advertisers, and other partners in voicing concerns about AB 83. This diverse coalition, including civil liberties advocates, leading businesses and industry groups, reflects a shared belief that the bill, as written, could have unintended consequences for lawful promotional practices without offering clear consumer protections.

The debate over AB 831 places California at the center of the national conversation regarding how to classify and regulate modern forms of online games and promotions. The outcome of the legislative process is being closely watched by multiple industries, as it could set a significant precedent for how such activities are treated across the United States.

Dimitri Dimitrov

Dimitri is an iGaming expert with nearly a decade of experience and a knack for crafting content that speaks directly to the iGaming crowd. He understands affiliate marketing, player psychology, and search algorithms, which enables him to write engaging, data-driven articles.

Sources
Source documentation not yet available for this article
Our editorial team is in the process of verifying and documenting sources for this content.
Mentioned in this Article