Chicago Introduces 10.25% Sports Betting Tax by Default Amid Budget Standoff

by Dimitri Dimitrov Published on December 24, 2025
Editorial Standards

☆ Editorial Standards

All news content is produced by qualified journalists and analysts under a published editorial code requiring accuracy, source verification, and editorial review prior to publication.

Advertisers and commercial partners have no influence over news coverage.


News editorial policy · Contact us
✓ Fact-Checked

✓ Fact-Checked

Every article undergoes senior editorial review.

Regulatory and legal reporting is cross-referenced against primary sources including official government and regulatory authority records.

Corrections are issued transparently with a visible update notice.


News fact-check policy
⊘ Independence

⊘ Independence

Gamblers Connect is a B2B iGaming media platform.

Editorial decisions, including what to cover, how to cover it, and what to publish, are made independently by our newsroom.

Commercial partners may purchase publication frequency but cannot influence editorial tone, angle, or content.


News independence policy
↗ Commercial Disclosure

↗ Commercial Disclosure

Gamblers Connect is a B2B media platform. We generate revenue through subscriptions, B2B referral partnerships, directory listings, advertising, and media services.

Gamblers Connect is not a licensed gambling operator, affiliate, or player acquisition channel in any jurisdiction.

We do not earn revenue from player activity, wagers, or deposits.


News commercial disclosure · Contact us
A financial chart illustrating the combined tax impact on Chicago operators, showing the state, county, and new city tax layers.

Starting January 1, 2026, Chicago will implement a new 10.25% tax on sports betting revenue generated within city limits. The measure became law by default after Mayor Brandon Johnson declined to sign or veto the city’s 2026 budget ordinance.

The tax is embedded within a larger $16.6 billion budget package approved by the City Council, following a standoff over the mayor’s initial proposal for a corporate head tax.

A Layered Tax Burden 

This new municipal levy adds significant weight to an already complex tax structure for Illinois operators. The 10.25% city tax sits on top of the state’s progressive tax rate, which ranges from 20% to 40%, and a separate 2% tax imposed by Cook County.

Industry analysts warn that for major operators hitting the top state tier, the combined effective tax rate on Chicago-generated revenue could exceed 50%. Such a steep burden risks altering the economics of the regulated market, potentially forcing operators to reduce promotional spending and innovation.

Licensing Limbo and Industry Concerns 

Beyond the financial impact, operators are facing regulatory uncertainty. The Sports Betting Alliance has flagged a critical flaw in the ordinance: it requires sportsbooks to hold a city-level license but provides no clear pathway to obtain one.

“The ordinance creates a requirement to be licensed at the city level but does not establish how an operator can secure that license,” the Alliance noted, warning that this ambiguity could force companies to suspend operations in the city.

Furthermore, stakeholders argue that the tax hike could drive players toward the black market. “The new tax risks pushing players toward illegal and unregulated sportsbooks that do not pay taxes or provide consumer protections,” the Alliance stated.

State-Level Pushback 

The move has also sparked tension with state lawmakers. Proposals have been introduced in Springfield to limit local governments’ authority to tax gambling or to reduce state funding to cities that impose such levies, highlighting a growing conflict over gambling revenue control.

Dimitri Dimitrov

Dimitri is an iGaming expert with nearly a decade of experience and a knack for crafting content that speaks directly to the iGaming crowd. He understands affiliate marketing, player psychology, and search algorithms, which enables him to write engaging, data-driven articles.

Sources
Source documentation not yet available for this article
Our editorial team is in the process of verifying and documenting sources for this content.
Mentioned in this Article