Brazil Bans 27 Prediction Platforms for Operating as Unauthorized Gambling Sites

by Dimitri Dimitrov Published on April 27, 2026
Editorial Standards

☆ Editorial Standards

All news content is produced by qualified journalists and analysts under a published editorial code requiring accuracy, source verification, and editorial review prior to publication.

Advertisers and commercial partners have no influence over news coverage.


News editorial policy · Contact us
✓ Fact-Checked

✓ Fact-Checked

Every article undergoes senior editorial review.

Regulatory and legal reporting is cross-referenced against primary sources including official government and regulatory authority records.

Corrections are issued transparently with a visible update notice.


News fact-check policy
⊘ Independence

⊘ Independence

Gamblers Connect is a B2B iGaming media platform.

Editorial decisions, including what to cover, how to cover it, and what to publish, are made independently by our newsroom.

Commercial partners may purchase publication frequency but cannot influence editorial tone, angle, or content.


News independence policy
↗ Commercial Disclosure

↗ Commercial Disclosure

Gamblers Connect is a B2B media platform. We generate revenue through subscriptions, B2B referral partnerships, directory listings, advertising, and media services.

Gamblers Connect is not a licensed gambling operator, affiliate, or player acquisition channel in any jurisdiction.

We do not earn revenue from player activity, wagers, or deposits.


News commercial disclosure · Contact us
brazil ministry of finance betting ban

In a decisive move to regulate the country’s rapidly evolving digital wagering landscape, the Brazilian Ministry of Finance has officially prohibited 27 prediction markets from operating within national borders.

The enforcement action follows an extensive audit which concluded that these “prediction market” models were functioning as gambling betting sites without the necessary legal authorizations.

The “Prediction Market” Loophole

According to government officials, the targeted companies frequently marketed their services as financial investments or trades in derivative instruments.

However, regulatory agencies determined that the underlying mechanics, allowing users to wager on political decisions, economic indicators, and cultural phenomena, mirrored traditional gambling without adhering to Brazil’s strict consumer protection rules.

The scope of prohibited bets was vast, including:

  • Political Outcomes: Betting on election results in the USA, Venezuela, and Israel.
  • Geopolitical Events: Wagering on the outcome of military conflicts.
  • Social Trends: Predicting winners of arts, music, and gaming tournaments.

CMN Resolution and the Derivatives Market

This crackdown aligns with a new resolution adopted by Brazil’s National Monetary Council (CMN) on April 24. The mandate specifies that only derivatives tied to actual financial or economic indicators under the supervision of the Securities and Exchange Commission (CVM) are permitted.

By banning prediction markets like Kalshi and Polymarket, the Brazilian government aims to prevent an “unregulated parallel market” that exposes users to significant financial risk and potential over-indebtedness.

Crucially, this prohibition does not impact legally licensed sportsbooks or online casinos, which operate with predetermined odds. In contrast, prediction platforms settle contracts based on uncertain real-world outcomes that fall outside the scope of current betting legislation.

Organizations currently facing bans must now choose between adapting their entire business model to meet Brazilian legal standards or exiting the territory entirely to avoid further sanctions.

Dimitri Dimitrov

Dimitri is an iGaming expert with nearly a decade of experience and a knack for crafting content that speaks directly to the iGaming crowd. He understands affiliate marketing, player psychology, and search algorithms, which enables him to write engaging, data-driven articles.

Sources
Source documentation not yet available for this article
Our editorial team is in the process of verifying and documenting sources for this content.
Mentioned in this Article