Unibet Fined AU$1 Million Over Breaches of Self-Exclusion Rules

by Dimitri Dimitrov Published on May 29, 2025
Last updated on June 10, 2025
Editorial Standards

☆ Editorial Standards

All news content is produced by qualified journalists and analysts under a published editorial code requiring accuracy, source verification, and editorial review prior to publication.

Advertisers and commercial partners have no influence over news coverage.


News editorial policy · Contact us
✓ Fact-Checked

✓ Fact-Checked

Every article undergoes senior editorial review.

Regulatory and legal reporting is cross-referenced against primary sources including official government and regulatory authority records.

Corrections are issued transparently with a visible update notice.


News fact-check policy
⊘ Independence

⊘ Independence

Gamblers Connect is a B2B iGaming media platform.

Editorial decisions, including what to cover, how to cover it, and what to publish, are made independently by our newsroom.

Commercial partners may purchase publication frequency but cannot influence editorial tone, angle, or content.


News independence policy
↗ Commercial Disclosure

↗ Commercial Disclosure

Gamblers Connect is a B2B media platform. We generate revenue through subscriptions, B2B referral partnerships, directory listings, advertising, and media services.

Gamblers Connect is not a licensed gambling operator, affiliate, or player acquisition channel in any jurisdiction.

We do not earn revenue from player activity, wagers, or deposits.


News commercial disclosure · Contact us
Untitled design 11 1

Unibet has been fined AU$1 million by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) for failing to comply with self-exclusion rules under the Interactive Gambling Act 2001.

The penalty follows an extensive ACMA investigation into the operator’s handling of self-excluded customer accounts via the BetStop system.

The investigation revealed that 954 Unibet customer accounts remained active even after users had registered with BetStop, Australia’s national self-exclusion register. Notably, 45 of these accounts stayed open for over 190 days, including some created on BetStop’s launch day.

Although no bets were placed during the self-exclusion period, the accounts were not promptly closed, breaching legal obligations.

Further, ACMA found that after self-exclusion periods ended, 45 customers were able to place bets using old accounts. In a striking example, one individual placed over 1,200 bets using an account that should have been permanently shut down.

Under the Interactive Gambling Act, operators must immediately close the accounts of individuals who opt for self-exclusion. Should those users wish to resume gambling after their exclusion ends, they are required to open a new account.

As part of its response, Unibet has entered into a two-year court-enforceable undertaking. This agreement includes an independent review of its compliance processes and a commitment to implement all recommended improvements. Additionally, the operator will voluntarily refund affected customers who accessed accounts that should have been deactivated.

This marks the first time ACMA has issued a financial penalty related to breaches of the National Self-Exclusion Register (NSER) rules.

Carolyn Lidgerwood, Gambling Lead and Member of ACMA, stated:

This outcome puts the industry on notice. Operators must comply with self-exclusion rules or face serious financial and regulatory consequences.

Dimitri Dimitrov

Dimitri is an iGaming expert with nearly a decade of experience and a knack for crafting content that speaks directly to the iGaming crowd. He understands affiliate marketing, player psychology, and search algorithms, which enables him to write engaging, data-driven articles.

Sources
Source documentation not yet available for this article
Our editorial team is in the process of verifying and documenting sources for this content.
Mentioned in this Article