Minnesota Legislators Advance Bill to Ban Prediction Markets While Delaying Sports Betting Vote

by Dimitri Dimitrov Published on April 16, 2026
Editorial Standards

☆ Editorial Standards

All news content is produced by qualified journalists and analysts under a published editorial code requiring accuracy, source verification, and editorial review prior to publication.

Advertisers and commercial partners have no influence over news coverage.


News editorial policy · Contact us
✓ Fact-Checked

✓ Fact-Checked

Every article undergoes senior editorial review.

Regulatory and legal reporting is cross-referenced against primary sources including official government and regulatory authority records.

Corrections are issued transparently with a visible update notice.


News fact-check policy
⊘ Independence

⊘ Independence

Gamblers Connect is a B2B iGaming media platform.

Editorial decisions, including what to cover, how to cover it, and what to publish, are made independently by our newsroom.

Commercial partners may purchase publication frequency but cannot influence editorial tone, angle, or content.


News independence policy
↗ Commercial Disclosure

↗ Commercial Disclosure

Gamblers Connect is a B2B media platform. We generate revenue through subscriptions, B2B referral partnerships, directory listings, advertising, and media services.

Gamblers Connect is not a licensed gambling operator, affiliate, or player acquisition channel in any jurisdiction.

We do not earn revenue from player activity, wagers, or deposits.


News commercial disclosure · Contact us
Senate Bill 4511 aims to provide state regulators with clear enforcement authority over unlicensed "bets" on politics and events.

Minnesota’s legislative landscape for gambling has taken a bifurcated turn. On Tuesday, a Senate committee officially advanced Senate Bill 4511, which classifies prediction markets as illegal gambling.

Simultaneously, a separate proposal to legalize mobile sportsbooks was presented for informational purposes but was notably not put to a vote, leaving the future of legalized betting in the state in a state of uncertainty.

Prediction Markets Defined as Felonies

Lawmakers overwhelmingly supported treating prediction markets as gaming operations rather than financial instruments. Under the new bill, operating an unauthorized prediction market in Minnesota would be classified as a felony, carrying a potential five-year prison sentence and a $10,000 fine.

Senator John Marty was clear about the intent of Senate Bill 4511:

“We’re saying no, these are bets, sports bets, wagers on politics, things that are currently illegal. We believe it’s illegal, cease and desist, and then it’s up to state regulators.”

Senator Jordan Rasmusson further criticized the marketing of platforms like Kalshi, noting a disconnect between their legal and promotional claims:

“They keep telling customers they’re a gambling company, but when they get sued, they say they’re future markets.”

The Stalemate Over Sports Betting

While prediction markets face prohibition, the push for regulated sports betting remains stalled. The proposed bill would have granted tribal entities up to 11 operator licenses and set a 21-year-old age limit. Defenders argue that a regulated market would capture revenue currently lost to offshore sites and support public health programs.

However, social concerns remain a primary barrier. Legislators debated the potential for increased gambling addiction, though industry data suggests problem gambling rates in legal states remain between 1% and 2%. For now, Minnesota senators appear hesitant to make a definitive decision, continuing a pattern of caution regarding the social repercussions of gambling expansion.

Dimitri Dimitrov

Dimitri is an iGaming expert with nearly a decade of experience and a knack for crafting content that speaks directly to the iGaming crowd. He understands affiliate marketing, player psychology, and search algorithms, which enables him to write engaging, data-driven articles.

Sources
Source documentation not yet available for this article
Our editorial team is in the process of verifying and documenting sources for this content.
Mentioned in this Article