Dutch Court Orders Restitution in BetCity Free Bet Fraud Scheme

by Dimitri Dimitrov Published on March 23, 2026
Editorial Standards

☆ Editorial Standards

All news content is produced by qualified journalists and analysts under a published editorial code requiring accuracy, source verification, and editorial review prior to publication.

Advertisers and commercial partners have no influence over news coverage.


News editorial policy · Contact us
✓ Fact-Checked

✓ Fact-Checked

Every article undergoes senior editorial review.

Regulatory and legal reporting is cross-referenced against primary sources including official government and regulatory authority records.

Corrections are issued transparently with a visible update notice.


News fact-check policy
⊘ Independence

⊘ Independence

Gamblers Connect is a B2B iGaming media platform.

Editorial decisions, including what to cover, how to cover it, and what to publish, are made independently by our newsroom.

Commercial partners may purchase publication frequency but cannot influence editorial tone, angle, or content.


News independence policy
↗ Commercial Disclosure

↗ Commercial Disclosure

Gamblers Connect is a B2B media platform. We generate revenue through subscriptions, B2B referral partnerships, directory listings, advertising, and media services.

Gamblers Connect is not a licensed gambling operator, affiliate, or player acquisition channel in any jurisdiction.

We do not earn revenue from player activity, wagers, or deposits.


News commercial disclosure · Contact us
BetCity Former Employee Ordered To Pay Damages to Entain

A Dutch court has ordered a former BetCity employee and a player to repay substantial damages, after a fraudulent scheme involving unauthorised free bets generated significant financial losses for Entain-owned BetCity operator BetEnt B.V.

The District Court of Amsterdam ruled that the employee breached his contract by deliberately issuing hundreds of free play credits without justification. These credits, normally capped at €200 and meant for customer support cases, were then issued in bulk to selected accounts in a manner that bypassed internal controls. The court found that there was excessive allocation of credits to four player accounts, amounting to nearly €496,000 in free bets.

Unlawful Conduct and Deliberate Circumvention of Controls

The credits were then spent, generating winnings of over €354,000, with total winnings exceeding €401,000 as play continued. One of the account holders was also a defendant in the court. It was found that the employee and the player had acted unlawfully, and they were jointly liable for part of the damages.

The employee alone was held responsible for additional sums linked to other accounts involved in the scheme. Judges rejected arguments that the operator shared responsibility due to insufficient oversight. The ruling noted that the employee intentionally circumvented fraud detection systems by using non-standard processes and structuring withdrawals below monitoring thresholds.

Judgement on Financial Liability and Account Closure

The court also dismissed claims that the employee’s alleged gambling problem should mitigate liability, citing a lack of evidence and no indication that the employer was aware of such issues. A request to reduce damages based on financial hardship was similarly denied, with the court emphasising the intentional nature of the misconduct.

In total, the BetCity employee was ordered to repay multiple amounts, including €82,856.50 and €60,481.04 tied to winnings on other accounts, alongside shared liability of €73,230.11 with the player. The court found that BetEnt, which was fined €2.65m last October for responsible gaming failures, had made the right move in closing the player’s account in June 2023.

Dimitri Dimitrov

Dimitri is an iGaming expert with nearly a decade of experience and a knack for crafting content that speaks directly to the iGaming crowd. He understands affiliate marketing, player psychology, and search algorithms, which enables him to write engaging, data-driven articles.

Sources
Source documentation not yet available for this article
Our editorial team is in the process of verifying and documenting sources for this content.
Mentioned in this Article