California Attorney General Declares Daily Fantasy Sports Illegal

by Dimitri Dimitrov Published on July 4, 2025
Editorial Standards

☆ Editorial Standards

All news content is produced by qualified journalists and analysts under a published editorial code requiring accuracy, source verification, and editorial review prior to publication.

Advertisers and commercial partners have no influence over news coverage.


News editorial policy · Contact us
✓ Fact-Checked

✓ Fact-Checked

Every article undergoes senior editorial review.

Regulatory and legal reporting is cross-referenced against primary sources including official government and regulatory authority records.

Corrections are issued transparently with a visible update notice.


News fact-check policy
⊘ Independence

⊘ Independence

Gamblers Connect is a B2B iGaming media platform.

Editorial decisions, including what to cover, how to cover it, and what to publish, are made independently by our newsroom.

Commercial partners may purchase publication frequency but cannot influence editorial tone, angle, or content.


News independence policy
↗ Commercial Disclosure

↗ Commercial Disclosure

Gamblers Connect is a B2B media platform. We generate revenue through subscriptions, B2B referral partnerships, directory listings, advertising, and media services.

Gamblers Connect is not a licensed gambling operator, affiliate, or player acquisition channel in any jurisdiction.

We do not earn revenue from player activity, wagers, or deposits.


News commercial disclosure · Contact us
Untitled design 256 1

In a landmark development for the gaming industry, California’s Attorney General, Rob Bonta, has issued a formal legal opinion concluding that daily fantasy sports (DFS) contests are prohibited under current state law.

The opinion, published on July 3, 2025, represents a significant challenge to DFS operators active in one of the nation’s most populous and lucrative markets.

The ruling was issued in response to a request for clarity from a state legislator.

Attorney General Bonta’s office found that DFS games, including both traditional “draft style” and the increasingly popular “pick’em” formats, constitute illegal sports wagering as defined by the California Penal Code. The relevant statute expressly forbids placing bets on the outcome of any contest involving skill, speed, or endurance.

According to the opinion, because DFS participants pay an entry fee for a chance to win a prize based on the real-world performances of professional athletes, these contests fall squarely within the state’s definition of prohibited gambling.

This legal interpretation aligns California with other states that have determined certain fantasy contests, particularly pick’em style games, function as de facto sports betting.

The Attorney General’s opinion explicitly states that the physical location of the DFS operator or its servers does not matter; offering these contests to players located within California is a violation of state law.

While California does not currently have a legal market for sports betting outside of horse racing and limited tribal gaming, this opinion creates significant uncertainty for major DFS platforms that have operated for years in the state.

The finding sets the stage for potential enforcement actions or new legislative efforts to either formally regulate or explicitly ban the activity, forcing a major shift for the industry in the months ahead.

Dimitri Dimitrov

Dimitri is an iGaming expert with nearly a decade of experience and a knack for crafting content that speaks directly to the iGaming crowd. He understands affiliate marketing, player psychology, and search algorithms, which enables him to write engaging, data-driven articles.

Sources
Source documentation not yet available for this article
Our editorial team is in the process of verifying and documenting sources for this content.
Mentioned in this Article