CFTC, Kalshi, and Polymarket Press Federal Court as Minnesota Prediction-Market Ban Deadline Looms

by Dimitri Dimitrov Published on July 27, 2026
Editorial Standards

☆ Editorial Standards

All news content is produced by qualified journalists and analysts under a published editorial code requiring accuracy, source verification, and editorial review prior to publication.

Advertisers and commercial partners have no influence over news coverage.


News editorial policy · Contact us
✓ Fact-Checked

✓ Fact-Checked

Every article undergoes senior editorial review.

Regulatory and legal reporting is cross-referenced against primary sources including official government and regulatory authority records.

Corrections are issued transparently with a visible update notice.


News fact-check policy
⊘ Independence

⊘ Independence

Gamblers Connect is a B2B iGaming media platform.

Editorial decisions, including what to cover, how to cover it, and what to publish, are made independently by our newsroom.

Commercial partners may purchase publication frequency but cannot influence editorial tone, angle, or content.


News independence policy
↗ Commercial Disclosure

↗ Commercial Disclosure

Gamblers Connect is a B2B media platform. We generate revenue through subscriptions, B2B referral partnerships, directory listings, advertising, and media services.

Gamblers Connect is not a licensed gambling operator, affiliate, or player acquisition channel in any jurisdiction.

We do not earn revenue from player activity, wagers, or deposits.


News commercial disclosure · Contact us
Close-up of a tablet and computer screen displaying financial market charts and trading data representing regulatory oversight.
Key Takeaways
⏱ 2 min read
1
Expedited Ruling Requested — The CFTC has asked a federal court for an immediate decision before Minnesota's prediction-market ban becomes active on August 1
2
Platform Intervention — Kalshi and Polymarket joined the CFTC's request for a temporary administrative stay while pursuing their own separate legal challenges against the state
3
Federal vs. State Authority — The core dispute questions whether federally regulated event contracts fall exclusively under CFTC oversight or are subject to individual state gambling regulations
4
Appellate Escalation — If the district court does not act promptly, the CFTC and prediction platforms are prepared to pursue emergency relief at the federal appeals court level

Urgent Legal Showdown Ahead of August 1 Ban

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has urged a federal court to expedite its ruling on a preliminary injunction before Minnesota’s ban on prediction markets takes effect on August 1. Signed by Governor Tim Walz in May, the state measure criminalizes the creation, operation, facilitation, or advertising of prediction markets within Minnesota.

In response, the CFTC sued Minnesota on May 19, asserting that state law conflicts with the federal derivatives framework established under the Commodity Exchange Act. With no ruling issued following the initial hearing, the CFTC indicated it will treat the motion as constructively denied if the court fails to act or temporarily stay the law, paving the way for the regulator to seek emergency appellate relief.

Industry Implications and Regulatory Oversight

Prediction platforms Kalshi and Polymarket have filed separate legal challenges to stop the enforcement of Minnesota’s ban, joining the request for a temporary administrative stay. While the platforms are structured under federal law like commodity trading rather than traditional gambling, states argue that such markets function as unlicensed casinos that expose residents to financial harm and addiction. Conversely, the CFTC maintains that state laws threaten to criminalize federally registered operators and participants.

Beyond the Minnesota litigation, the CFTC continues to tighten its regulatory oversight of event-contract filings. The agency recently issued a warning instructing registered exchanges to submit detailed, product-specific contract terms rather than broad template filings. Meanwhile, broader rules proposed by the CFTC regarding event contracts tied to sensitive topics have drawn industry support.

Groups like the Hyperliquid Policy Center and Multicoin Capital submitted a joint filing arguing that exchange-traded contracts differ fundamentally from traditional bookmaker wagers and warning that complying with 50 separate state regimes would fracture the federal market structure.

Dimitri Dimitrov

Dimitri is an iGaming expert with nearly a decade of experience and a knack for crafting content that speaks directly to the iGaming crowd. He understands affiliate marketing, player psychology, and search algorithms, which enables him to write engaging, data-driven articles.

Sources
1 source verified before publication. This news is an official press release that traces directly to official documents by CFTC. How we verify sources →
1
CFTC
· Official Body Primary
https://www.cftc.gov/ ↗
Gamblers Connect only publishes verified news from official government organizations. Read our full editorial standards →
Mentioned in this Article